Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Public Sphere vs The Oil Industry...

By: Roy Sim & Science of Pollution Group

If the public sphere teaches us anything, it should be that action is supposed to be influenced by the public sphere. The issues the public identifies as most crucial to society are the topics that should be addressed first. While there are numerous environmental concerns pertaining to society today, the most significant and pressing matter is the impact of oil.

Oil – specifically petroleum, also known as crude oil – has many facets. Not only is the resource itself becoming scarce, the actual drilling for oil has been detrimental to the environment and earth. The increased exploration and extraction of oil results in more refining and transporting, the outcome then is more pipelines and larger consumption of the resource. The production, distribution, refining and retailing of petroleum based products as a whole, represents the world’s largest industry in terms of dollar value.

Areas that were once rich in oil are drying up and new land is being searched for possible oil reserves. According to the 2008 BP Statistical Review of World Energy, the United States is the largest consumers and importers of oil worldwide.[1] Gasoline accounts for 46% of uses for petroleum. Other nations, such as China, are showing rapid growth in consumption as well. Still the United States remains as the highest consumers of oil at over 19.5 million barrels per day, which is higher than the entire European Union.[2]

Thus assuming the world consumes at our current rates, there is enough world petroleum reserves to last for 40 years reports Technical Editor Margery Conner of Electronic Design, Strategy, News.

The article points out four key points:[3]

1. Two-thirds of oil reserves are in the Middle East

2. The fossil fuel that’s seen the fastest increase in consumption is coal (because certain power stations rely on coal, and are being built in China and burning creates more green-house gas emissions than any other form of energy)

3. The world’s proven reserves of natural gas rose, and are enough to provide more than 60 years of current consumption

4. Some economists say oil is already and its peak. However BP says, “We don't believe there is an absolute resource constraint. When peak oil comes, it is just as likely to come from consumption peaking, perhaps because of climate change policies or for some other reason, as from production peaking."

For years the public has been aware of the issue at hand. As a result, the public sphere has become more concerned and attempts for viable solutions are being found. However, the effects of oil are felt worldwide. Oil spills cause harm to the oceans, wildlife and environment as a whole. The drilling for oil and implementing of pipelines causes land and habitats to be destroyed. Petroleum is one of the highest contributors to global fossil carbon emissions with coal a close second.

Because of the public sphere’s concerns, there has been a rise in solutions to ease the problem as well. Alternative-fuel vehicles are being researched everyday. The use of Hybrid cars helps alleviate some of the effects, but these cars still use fossil fuels. Thus, car companies are looking into hydrogen-fuel cell based vehicles. These cars have their own energy generating power plants on board with zero carbon emissions. It fuels up with hydrogen and the only byproduct is water (hydrogen plus oxygen equals water). Solutions such as these help move along the process to a cleaner future. It is important to realize the impacts the oil industry has. Its reach influences economic issues including environmental ones. Individuals must take it upon themselves to do their part and reduce their carbon footprint.

The future of motoring:

Sources:

1. www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/reports_and_publications/statistical_energy_review_2008/STAGING/local_assets/downloads/pdf/statistical_review_of_world_energy_full_review_2008.pdf

2. www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2174rank.html

3. www.edn.com/blog/1470000147/post/1030010703.html


Global Warming... Rocking This World

Came across a great article on global warming and its possible effects on earthquakes... check it out!

http://www.livescience.com/environment/070830_gw_quakes.html

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

How the media frames Global Warming and its impact on Earthquakes...

By: Tristan Nguyen & Science of Pollution Group

Earthquakes are said to be responsible by humans from the fact that they are sole contributors to global warming. Global warming causes the polar ice caps to melt and that contribute tremendous amounts of weight are lifted off of Earth's crust and this can cause seismic plates to slip and stimulate earthquake activity according to research into prehistoric earthquakes and volcanic activity. As human go through their daily life they generate pollution by creating waste and putting airborne pollutant into the atmosphere. From factory mills, chemical, production, cars, sewage, and oil human contaminate the earth. Carbon monoxide is the main problem and concern for the Earth’s well-being, because the more carbon monoxide human place in the atmosphere the quicker global warming will get worst hence contributing to climate change. Pollution caused by humans are not the only contributors to earthquakes. For example other factors include coal mining and construction of dams.

An article in the National Geographic News titled “Coal Mining Causing Earthquakes, Study Says” refers to the earthquake in Austria in 1989 were caused by humans. It was proven by Christian D. Klose of Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, New York; that the quake was triggered by changes in tectonic forces caused by two-hundred years of underground coal mining. This article frames the story in a way that directly blames human for the earthquake that happened in Austria; however the framing strategy they used was hidden in their context, because the article did not directly say humans caused the quake, rather coal mining in general caused the earthquake. As you can see framing is a key factor in getting viewers and the audience to believe a certain idea or concept. The way a story is framed will affect how people will react and perceive the story.

In an interview Danny Glover, a Hollywood celebrity, blamed Haiti’s earth quake on global warming and climate change. "What happened in Haiti could happen anywhere in the Caribbean because all these island nations are in peril because of global warming," Glover said. "When we see what we did at the climate summit in Copenhagen, this is the response, this is what happens."

In this case study Danny Glover framed the news segment toward global warming to his viewers. He is not telling them what to think, however he is suggesting to them what to think about. The “what” Glover is mentioning is climate change and global warming in relations to the earthquake in Haiti. When the viewers watch his interview they will stop to think about global warming and how they can take part in order save the environment. Glover wants humans to be more concerned about the environment and do what they can to stop climate change. His message also subtlety implies people should go “green” and adopt greener alternatives such as hybrid cars and recycling.

Sources:

1. Top 5 Ways to Cause a Man-Made Earthquake
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/06/top-5-ways-that/

2. Some earthquakes may be linked to climate change
http://news.mongabay.com/2006/0628-earthquakes.html

3. Video: Danny Glover: Haiti Earthquake Caused By Global Warming
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/15/danny-glover-haiti-earthq_n_425160.html

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Pollution around the world...

A slide show presented by NY Times reporter Andrew Revkin regarding climate change and pollution. Both of these issues are negative contributors to the environment. The photos depict the effects worldwide.